Integrity & ethics
Clear standards, strong checks, and responsible editorial decision-making.

Clear standards, strong checks, and responsible editorial decision-making.
Editorial decisions based on scholarly merit and fit, free from commercial pressure.
Structured review and editorial guidance to improve clarity, accuracy, and robustness.
Clear policies, predictable steps, and honest communication throughout the process.
Welcoming research from diverse regions, disciplines, and institutions worldwide.
Strong indexing and open dissemination to maximize reach, readership, and reuse.
To improve speed and fit, choose a journal aligned with your topic, methods, and contribution.
Match your paper to the journal's focus and audience.
Formatting, required statements, and the journal's review model.
APC status, discounts, and waiver options are stated per journal.
To improve speed and fit, choose a journal aligned with your topic, methods, and contribution.

Review the journal's aims and scope, author guidelines, and stated policies before submitting.
All the received manuscripts are first screened by the editors as to their scope and quality as well as to check compliance with the scope, quality and submission policies of the journal. This phase confirms that the manuscript is complete, follows formatting rules and meets the ethical standards, including authorship, disclosures and data integrity. This is because in terms of editorial screening, problems are detected early hence delay in peer review is minimized and only appropriate manuscripts will go through the evaluation process. This will help to make the workflow more efficient and ensure that the quality of all submissions is the same.
Editory Press has a well-organized and transparent peer review system that can guarantee academic rigor and equity. Qualified and non-conflict reviewers whose expertise in the subject is relevant are allocated to manuscripts. We also organize every phase of the review procedure, including inviting the reviews and collecting their feedback and making decisions about the editorial, which would guarantee timely communication between authors, reviewers, and editors. The aim is to give positive yet evidence based feedback that builds the manuscript in such a way that the integrity and credibility of the research is not compromised.
The process of revision is transparent and systematic after peer review in support of authors. The editorial decisions are conveyed by means of elaborate reviewer remarks, which provide the authors with the chance to comprehend the required amendments and enhance their manuscript in the most efficient way. We promote systematic reactions to reviewer feedbacks and give information regarding revision expectation. Such a clear workflow process assists in improving resubmissions, lessening their uncertainty, and maintaining alignment of resubmissions to editorial standards and reviewer advice.
After acceptance a manuscript is sent into the production stage where it is formatted to be published as per professional journal standards. This involves formatting, layout optimization, reference consistency and end quality checks. Each article in our production process is made to appear clear, professional with readability, visual consistency and accuracy. The high quality of production increases accessibility of the study as well as credibility of the publication.
Editory Press follows a metadata-first publishing approach to ensure that every article is supported by accurate, standardized, and machine-readable information from the beginning of the publication process. This includes author details, affiliations, abstracts, keywords, references, and citation metadata, together with export options such as RIS and BibTeX for compatibility with reference management systems and academic databases. High-quality metadata plays a critical role in improving article discoverability, citation accuracy, and long-term accessibility. By supporting structured metadata and widely used citation export formats, we help research integrate more effectively with search engines, indexing services, library systems, and scholarly tools used across the academic publishing ecosystem.
We follow a transparent and realistic approach to indexing. Each journal is developed with the goal of meeting the technical and quality requirements of major indexing and abstracting databases. Rather than making premature claims, Editory Press provides a clear indexing roadmap based on journal development, editorial quality, and publication consistency. This ensures that progress toward indexing is aligned with recognized standards and supports long-term visibility and credibility.
Each journal defines its peer review model and author requirements on the journal page. Submissions are evaluated for scope and quality before external peer review.
Initial screening (1-3 days), reviewer invitation and assignment (about 1 week), peer review (2-4 weeks), and an editorial decision often within 6-8 weeks.
Open access makes your research immediately available to readers worldwide. Licensing determines how others can reuse your work with appropriate attribution.
The exact license is stated on each journal page. Authors typically retain copyright, while granting reuse rights under the journal's chosen Creative Commons license.
APC status may vary by journal. Please check the journal page for the current policy.
If a journal charges an APC, the amount and waiver options are stated clearly in its author information.
Waivers may be available for authors without institutional funding or from eligible regions. Requests are evaluated case-by-case according to the journal's policy.
Standard manuscript template (.docx)
Pre-submission requirements checklist
Citation formatting guidelines
LaTeX class file and template
How to disclose AI tool usage
Data sharing requirements

Start your submission now or browse journals to confirm scope and requirements.