Find a journal
Login In

Clinical & Molecular Biomedicine

Gold Open Access
Guide for Authors
Clinical & Molecular Biomedicine Cover

Clinical & Molecular Biomedicine

Gold Open AccessISSN 2345-2985
Translating Research into Better Healthcare
Samarkand State Medical University

In collaboration with

Samarkand State Medical University

Guide for Authors

About Article

Jump to section

Molecular Insights into Arylsulfatase B Mutation-Induced Instability in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI

Volume 1, No. 1 · 2026

Clinical & Molecular Biomedicine • Vol. 1, No. 1 • 2026
Download PDF
Open access PDF|CC BY 4.0|Open Access

Highlights

  • The study functionally annotated 92 hypothetical proteins from Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b using an integrative in silico workflow.
  • Sequence-based analyses used BLAST, Pfam, InterPro, motif analysis, and multiple sequence alignment to classify proteins into major functional groups.
  • Thirteen selected hypothetical proteins were modeled structurally using SWISS-MODEL and analyzed by PyMOL, DALI-Lite, and ProFunc.
  • Predicted functions covered hydrolases, transferases, transporters, kinases, stress-response proteins, membrane proteins, DNA-binding proteins, phosphoesterases, and ATP-binding proteins.
  • The work improves genome annotation quality for L. monocytogenes and proposes experimentally testable functions for previously uncharacterized proteins.

Abstract

The article addresses the large number of hypothetical proteins that remain uncharacterized in bacterial genomes despite rapid advances in sequencing.

Using Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b as a model pathogen, the study retrieved 92 hypothetical proteins and analyzed them through sequence similarity search, conserved-domain identification, motif analysis, and multiple sequence alignment.

Functional classification was primarily supported by BLAST, Pfam, and InterPro analyses, while selected proteins underwent homology modeling with SWISS-MODEL followed by structural validation and comparative analysis with PyMOL and DALI-Lite.

Structure-based functional inference was further supported by conserved-residue mapping and ProFunc analysis, which highlighted catalytic residues, ligand-binding regions, metal-binding sites, and other conserved functional motifs.

Overall, the study proposes roles for many previously uncharacterized proteins in enzymatic activity, transport, transcriptional regulation, stress adaptation, nucleotide metabolism, and membrane biology, and identifies candidates for future experimental validation.

Keywords

Listeria monocytogeneshypothetical proteinsfunctional annotationhomology modelinggenome analysisstructural predictionprotein function prediction
Previous article in issueNext article in issue

Article Overview

This article focuses on hypothetical proteins in Listeria monocytogenes, emphasizing that genomic sequencing has outpaced experimental functional annotation and left many predicted proteins uncharacterized.

The study frames functional annotation as important both for improving genome quality and for identifying potential biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and previously unknown biological pathways.

Because Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b is a major food-borne pathogen with high mortality and contains 92 hypothetical proteins in its genome, the paper applies sequence-based and structure-based bioinformatics approaches to assign plausible functions to these proteins.

1. About the Article

This is a research article in Clinical & Molecular Biomedicine centered on genome-wide annotation and structural modeling of hypothetical proteins in Listeria monocytogenes.

The paper is authored by Shama Khan of the South African Medical Research Council / University of the Witwatersrand, with contact emails and an ORCID listed on the first page.

  • Journal: Clinical & Molecular Biomedicine
  • Volume/Issue: Vol. 1, No. 1
  • Header year: 2026
  • Title: Genome-wide annotation and structural modeling of hypothetical proteins in Listeria monocytogenes
  • Author: Shama Khan
  • Affiliation: South African Medical Research Council, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit (VIDA), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Corresponding author: Shama Khan
  • Corresponding emails: Shama.Khan@wits-vida.org; Shama.Khan@wits.ac.za
  • ORCID: 0000-0002-0874-5029
  • License: Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
  • Open-access status: Open Access
  • Header page range on first page: pp. 1–25
  • Visible article page range in uploaded PDF: 1–12

2. Introduction

The introduction explains that hypothetical proteins are predicted from nucleotide sequence but lack direct experimental protein-level validation, and that many sequenced genomes still contain large fractions of such uncharacterized open reading frames.

The article argues that assigning functions to hypothetical proteins is essential for improving genome annotation, discovering new folds and domains, identifying biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and expanding understanding of biological pathways.

For Listeria monocytogenes, the paper emphasizes its clinical importance as a food-borne pathogen with high mortality and notes that serotype 4b contains 92 hypothetical proteins whose functions are poorly characterized.

  • Organism of interest: Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b
  • Genome size noted: approximately 3 Mb
  • Total nucleotides reported: 2,912,690
  • Total protein genes reported: 2,766
  • Total RNA genes reported: 85
  • Hypothetical proteins highlighted in the genome: 92

3. Materials and Methods

The workflow begins with retrieval of 92 hypothetical protein sequences from the PIR website, saving them in FASTA format and tabulating accession numbers, molecular mass, length, and proposed functions.

Function prediction relied on sequence similarity searches with BLASTP, multiple sequence alignment with ClustalW, conserved domain and motif annotation with Pfam and InterPro, and structural-function prediction using SWISS-MODEL, PyMOL, DALI-Lite, and ProFunc.

Structural analysis included homology modeling of selected proteins, superposition and RMSD analysis in PyMOL, and comparison of modeled proteins with known templates to identify conserved active-site and ligand-binding residues.

  • Data source for hypothetical proteins: PIR website
  • Number of hypothetical proteins downloaded: 92
  • Sequence format used for downstream analysis: FASTA
  • Sequence tools: BLASTP; ClustalW; Pfam; InterPro
  • Structure modeling server: SWISS-MODEL
  • Visualization and superposition tool: PyMOL
  • Structure-comparison tool used in the study: DALI-Lite
  • Structure-based function inference tool: ProFunc

2.1. Data mining

The authors analyzed the Listeria monocytogenes genome at the PIR website and downloaded 92 hypothetical protein sequences.

Protein sequences were recorded with accession number, length, molecular mass, and proposed function, and saved in FASTA format for further analysis.

2.2. Sequence similarity search

BLASTP against public protein databases was used to identify related proteins and infer possible function from homologs of known activity.

Multiple sequence alignment with ClustalW was used to analyze conserved residues and support function prediction.

2.3. Structure Prediction

Homology modeling was used to infer three-dimensional structures of selected hypothetical proteins through template identification, alignment, fragment assembly, refinement, and energy minimization.

SWISS-MODEL was used to generate models, and 13 hypothetical proteins were selected for detailed structural analysis.

2.4. Function prediction

The article discusses several complementary function-prediction strategies, including clustering of gene-expression profiles, protein-protein interaction networks, motif/signature databases, and structure-based inference.

In practice, this study specifically used Pfam, InterPro, and ProFunc for functional interpretation.

2.5. Visualization

PyMOL was used for superposition of modeled proteins with templates, secondary-structure-based alignment, RMSD calculations, and residue-level visualization.

2.6. Structure analysis

The authors describe structure-based comparison methods for identifying remote homology and conserved functional sites, and select DALI-Lite for structural comparison in this work.

4. Results and Discussion

Sequence-based analysis classified all 92 hypothetical proteins into 13 broad categories, including hydrolase, transferase, transporter, RNA binding, hydrolase acting on carbon–nitrogen bonds, kinase, response to stress, integral membrane, DNA binding, phosphoesterase, ATP binding, others, and unknown.

Structural modeling was successfully carried out for 13 hypothetical proteins, and the models were compared with experimentally characterized templates to identify conserved catalytic residues, metal-binding sites, ligand-binding motifs, and likely molecular functions.

The study concludes that sequence-based classification plus structure-based analysis substantially improves annotation quality for Listeria monocytogenes, although several predictions with low sequence identity or high RMSD require cautious interpretation and future biochemical validation.

  • Total hypothetical proteins analyzed: 92
  • Number of proteins structurally modeled in detail: 13
  • Major classes reported: hydrolase; transferase; transporter; RNA binding; C–N hydrolase; kinase; stress response; integral membrane; DNA binding; phosphoesterase; ATP binding; others; unknown

3.1. Sequence-based Function Prediction

The article grouped all 92 hypothetical proteins into major functional categories based primarily on sequence similarity, motif composition, and conserved-domain evidence.

Hydrolases and transferases were among the largest groups, while additional categories included transporters, RNA-binding proteins, kinases, stress proteins, membrane proteins, DNA-binding proteins, phosphoesterases, ATP-binding proteins, other singleton functions, and unknown proteins.

  • Hydrolase examples: C1L0U3, C1L0R8, C1KZQ3, C1KZE1, C1KYZ2, C1KYY1, C1KY45, C1KY43, C1KXZ5
  • Transferase examples: C1L2K8, C1L1Z7, C1L0P3, C1L0L0, C1L024, C1KYI4, C1KXY4, C1KVW1, C1KVA0
  • Transporter examples: C1L300, C1L1R1, C1L164, C1L0K2, C1KZ81, C1KZ17, C1KYZ6, C1KY61, C1KY46

3.2. Structure-based Function Prediction

Templates were identified for thirteen proteins, and structural superimposition plus residue conservation analysis was used to infer active sites and likely biochemical roles.

Some predictions are strongly supported by high sequence identity and low RMSD, while others are marked as tentative due to weak structural agreement.

3.2.1. C1L1U8

Model built for residues 6–555 with 81.09% sequence identity to template and RMSD of 0.1 Å.

Conserved Zn2+-binding residues and catalytic residues support annotation as a nuclease, possibly with 5′–3′ exonuclease activity.

  • Model size: residues 6–555
  • Sequence identity: 81.09%
  • RMSD: 0.1 Å
  • Predicted function: nuclease / possible 5′–3′ exonuclease

3.2.2. C1KYM2

Model built for residues 2–259 with 37.31% sequence identity and RMSD of 1.359 Å.

Conserved catalytic triad residues and binding-cavity features support hydrolase activity acting on carbon–nitrogen bonds.

  • Sequence identity: 37.31%
  • RMSD: 1.359 Å

3.2.3. C1KYY1

Model built for residues 1–439 with 48.23% sequence identity and RMSD of 0.7 Å.

Conservation of the catalytic dyad and ligand-contact residues suggests a deoxynucleotide triphosphate triphosphohydrolase (dNTPase).

  • Sequence identity: 48.23%
  • RMSD: 0.7 Å
  • Predicted function: dNTPase

3.2.4. C1L0M8

Model built for residues 5–105 with 40.78% sequence identity and RMSD of 0.5 Å.

Conserved DNA-binding residues suggest a transcriptional regulator involved in phenolic-acid metabolism.

  • Sequence identity: 40.78%
  • RMSD: 0.5 Å
  • Predicted function: transcriptional regulator of phenolic acid

3.2.5. C1L0R8

Model built for residues 201–605 with 30.07% sequence identity and RMSD of 0.5 Å.

Conserved residues related to LTA synthesis and metal coordination support a role in lipoteichoic acid biosynthesis / sulfuric ester hydrolase-associated function.

  • Sequence identity: 30.07%
  • RMSD: 0.5 Å

3.2.6. C1L165

Model built for residues 5–176 with 41.28% sequence identity and RMSD of 0.2 Å.

Conserved residues support binding to poly-isoprenoid.

  • Sequence identity: 41.28%
  • RMSD: 0.2 Å
  • Predicted function: poly-isoprenoid binding

3.2.7. C1L2E5

Model built for residues 1–158 with 22.50% sequence identity and RMSD of 3.919 Å.

Conserved metal-binding residues suggest possible phosphodiesterase activity, but low identity limits confidence.

  • Sequence identity: 22.50%
  • RMSD: 3.919 Å
  • Confidence note: low-confidence functional inference

3.2.8. C1KZM7

Model built for residues 3–142 with 30.41% sequence identity and RMSD of 0.085 Å.

The study tentatively associates the protein with stress response and ectoine production involved in osmotic stress survival.

  • Sequence identity: 30.41%
  • RMSD: 0.085 Å
  • Predicted function: possible stress protein / ectoine-related role

3.2.9. C1KYZ6

Model built for residues 42–196 with 12.35% sequence identity and RMSD of 5.687 Å.

Because of very low sequence identity and high RMSD, the authors regard this model as insufficiently reliable for function prediction.

  • Sequence identity: 12.35%
  • RMSD: 5.687 Å
  • Confidence note: unreliable for functional inference

3.2.10. C1KYT3

Model built for residues 5–201 with 33.65% sequence identity and RMSD of 3.75 Å.

Conserved catalytic and substrate-binding residues suggest possible roles in differentiation, development, and regulation of cell proliferation.

  • Sequence identity: 33.65%
  • RMSD: 3.75 Å

3.2.11. C1KY51

Model built for residues 6–145 with 46.00% sequence identity and RMSD of 3.3 Å.

Conserved cysteines and Asp42 in the zinc-binding region support involvement in iron–sulfur cluster biology, electron transfer, or regulatory / sensing functions.

  • Sequence identity: 46.00%
  • RMSD: 3.3 Å
  • Predicted function: iron ion / Fe-S cluster-related role

3.2.12. C1KYL6

Model built for residues 4–271 with 25.19% sequence identity and RMSD of 0.091 Å.

Conserved active-site residues support a HAD superfamily phosphatase function involved in phosphoryl-transfer and hydrolytic dephosphorylation.

  • Sequence identity: 25.19%
  • RMSD: 0.091 Å
  • Predicted function: HAD superfamily phosphatase

3.2.13. C1KY50

Model built for residues 33–462 with 17.20% sequence identity and RMSD of 7.538 Å.

Conserved residues hint at an iron–sulfur cluster-related role, but the authors explicitly caution that the model is low-confidence and needs experimental validation.

  • Sequence identity: 17.20%
  • RMSD: 7.538 Å
  • Confidence note: interpret with caution

5. Conclusion

The article concludes that sequence-based analysis allowed plausible biochemical function assignment for most of the 92 hypothetical proteins, while structural modeling enabled detailed structure-function interpretation for 13 selected proteins.

The work is positioned as a structural genomics contribution that improves understanding of Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis and supports follow-up biochemical validation.

The authors also note that some proposed functions remain provisional and require further experimental work for precise confirmation.

  • Hypothetical proteins analyzed: 92
  • Proteins with detailed modeled structure-function analysis: 13
  • Main limitation acknowledged: experimental validation still required

6. Statements and Declarations

The article includes closing statements for conflict of interest, data availability, funding, acknowledgements, supplementary materials, and author contributions.

  • Conflict of Interest: There is no conflict of interest to declare.
  • Data Availability Statement: The data supporting this study are provided in this article.
  • Funding: None
  • Acknowledgements: None
  • Supplementary materials: None

10. Author Contributions

The author-contribution statement assigns the work to A.N., including conceptualization, data curation, virtual screening, molecular docking, ADMET analysis, PASS prediction, molecular dynamics simulations, formal analysis, figure/table preparation, and manuscript drafting.

This wording does not match the listed single author name on the article front page and appears to be a carryover from another paper.

  • A.N. conceptualized and designed the study.
  • A.N. performed data curation, virtual screening, molecular docking, ADMET analysis, PASS prediction, and molecular dynamics simulations.
  • A.N. conducted formal analysis and interpreted the results.
  • A.N. prepared figures and tables and wrote the original draft.
  • The statement ends with singular wording: 'The author reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.'

Figures

The PDF includes nine named figures covering the computational workflow, mutation-count summaries, conservation mapping, structural models, and final network-style comparisons.

Figure 1

Main figure
Main figure previewDownload
Figure 1. Outline of structure and function assignment to the hypothetical proteins.
Figure 1 · p. 2

Figure 1. Outline of structure and function assignment to the hypothetical proteins.

Download figure
Figure 2. Structural superimposition of modeled proteins C1L1U8, C1KYM2, C1KYY1, C1L0M8, C1L0R8, and C1L165 with their respective template structures.
Figure 2 · p. 6

Figure 2. Structural superimposition of modeled proteins C1L1U8, C1KYM2, C1KYY1, C1L0M8, C1L0R8, and C1L165 with their respective template structures.

Download figure
Figure 3. Structural superimposition of modeled proteins C1L2E5–C1KY50 with their respective template structures.
Figure 3 · p. 8

Figure 3. Structural superimposition of modeled proteins C1L2E5–C1KY50 with their respective template structures.

Download figure

References

  1. 1

    Chin, Ko-Hsin, Tsai, et al.

    Reference cited in the paper.

    2007
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  2. 2

    Fibriansah, G., Kovacs, A., Pool, T., et al.

    PLoS ONE article cited in the paper.

    PLoS ONE · 2012
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  3. 3

    Gury, J., Barthelmebs, L., Tran, N., Divies, C., & Cavin, J.

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology article cited in the paper.

    Appl Environ Microbiol · 2004
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  4. 4

    Handa, N., Terada, T., Doi-Katayama, Y., et al.

    Protein Science article cited in the paper.

    Protein Sci. · 2004
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  5. 5

    Liu, Jinyu, Oganesyan, et al.

    Proteins article cited in the paper.

    Proteins · 2005
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  6. 6

    Lu, Zhibing, Dunaway-Mariano, et al.

    Proteins article cited in the paper.

    Proteins · 2011
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  7. 7

    Rao, N.

    Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery article cited in the paper.

    J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · 1989
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  8. 8

    Vorontsov, I., I., Minasov, et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry article cited in the paper.

    J. Biol. Chem. · 2011
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  9. 9

    Wada, K., Sumi, N., Nagai, R., et al.

    Journal of Molecular Biology article cited in the paper.

    J. Mol. Biol. · 2009
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
  10. 10

    Xu, Yongbin, Sim, et al.

    Biochemistry article cited in the paper.

    Biochemistry · 2009
    Open articlePDFGoogle ScholarScopus
Clinical & Molecular Biomedicine cover

Explore

  • About journal
  • Aims and scope
  • Journal insights
  • All issues

For Authors

  • Guide for authors
  • Submission guide
  • Open access and publication
Editory Press

Publishing

  • Publish with us
  • Find a journal
  • Word template
  • Submission checklist
  • Reference style guide
  • Peer review policy

Resources

  • All journals
  • AI use guide

Resources

  • Editorial policy
  • Publication ethics
  • Research ethics and consent
  • Open access and publication

© 2026 Clinical & Molecular Biomedicine. All rights reserved.

  • Data availability guide
  • Open access & licensing
  • Publication ethics
  • LaTeX template
  • Company

    • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sign In
    info@editorypress.uzwww.editorypress.uz

    © 2026 EditoryPress. All rights reserved.